Renato constantino veneration without understanding reaction
1. Renato constantino veneration without understanding reaction
Answer:
thanks for the points points
2. what is your interpretation of Renato Constantino's "Veneration without understanding?
Answer:
i dont know what is veneration without understanding
3. what is your interpretation of Renato Constantino's " Veneration without Understanding"?
Answer:
Without Understanding answers whether or not Rizal deserves to be our national hero by understanding his nature historically. From Rizal’s reformist ideologies, racial aspirations, definition of liberty to his battle towards Filipinos’ freedom, the paper provides an in-depth analysis on how we could learn from Rizal's limitations and use it for our development. Aside from that, Constantino tends to challenge his readers to be critical in attributing our history and the works of people behind it.
When heard of the word “Rizal,” we always think of the person who died to free us, the exceptional human being, the Filipino Christ, or the great of the greatest that most of us aspire to be. This is society’s twisted mentality resulting from distorted ideas written in Philippine textbooks that are taught in secondary and even in tertiary education. There is, however, more to Rizal than what we already know about him. We fail to recognize that just like us, Rizal was a human. He made mistakes and he had his own weaknesses.
Some would argue that Constantino was trying to give Bonifacio a spotlight. But I do not think he was. He was simply trying to elaborate how shallow our knowledge about Rizal is and how this ignorance can be used to relate to challenges we are now going through – abhorring colonial mentality, attaining national identity, and yearning for independence. To say the least, Constantino was merely saying that social demands change overtime and so, we do not need to fully rely on Rizal’s national goals alone. We should learn from the weaknesses of great men and women of our history just like how we looked up to their strengths.
Everyone deserves the highest honour because everyone is capable of doing whatever we think is the best. The main question is not really whether or not Rizal deserves to be a national hero but rather “Is it necessary to have one National Hero?” Andres Bonifacio had his own setbacks, as well as Gabriela Silang, Heneral Antonio Luna, Apolinario Mabini, and all the great men and great women in our history. Each plays an important role in our history and yes, these heroes did what were needed for the betterment of our country. They did whatever they thought will be the good for all people during their time and they succeeded in their own way. They did it with courage when no one else could. If that is so, then what difference does it make if we only give the highest recognition to one person when there were thousands of people who worked hand-in-hand to develop the concept of a nation?
Rizal was a necessary movement. The first letter in the alphabet. The alpha. A moment in our history. But he was not just like that. He is the embodiment that we, younger generations, have the responsibility to finish what he started along with Bonifacio and the heroes after them. They shed blood for this nation and for future generations. They have molded us in every way they can. The future now depends solely on our hands and how we make good use of their strengths as well as their weaknesses.
4. According to Renato Constantino, what is the role of the educational system introduced by the Americans to Filipinos
Answer:
sorry hindi ko magets ang tanong
5. according to renato constantino , what is the historians task?
Answer:
One can well agree with Constantino that it is the historian's task to trace the pattern which gives meaning to the disparate events of the historical record, if it were one emerging from the events themselves.6. Are you familiar with Renato Constantino's Veneration WithoutUnderstanding? Research on Constantino's work and give some examplesof this unexamined adoration of the Filipinos towards Rizal. Explain why itis essential to truly understand Rizal's context before studying his life andworks
Answer:
This is a reaction paper I made three years ago for PI 100 (Rizal) course under Ms. Liyang Miñoza, one of my favorite professors in UP.
Renato Constantino’s Veneration Without Understanding answers whether or not Rizal deserves to be our national hero by understanding his nature historically. From Rizal’s reformist ideologies, racial aspirations, definition of liberty to his battle towards Filipinos’ freedom, the paper provides an in-depth analysis on how we could learn from Rizal's limitations and use it for our development. Aside from that, Constantino tends to challenge his readers to be critical in attributing our history and the works of people behind it.
When heard of the word “Rizal,” we always think of the person who died to free us, the exceptional human being, the Filipino Christ, or the great of the greatest that most of us aspire to be. This is society’s twisted mentality resulting from distorted ideas written in Philippine textbooks that are taught in secondary and even in tertiary education. There is, however, more to Rizal than what we already know about him. We fail to recognize that just like us, Rizal was a human. He made mistakes and he had his own weaknesses.
Some would argue that Constantino was trying to give Bonifacio a spotlight. But I do not think he was. He was simply trying to elaborate how shallow our knowledge about Rizal is and how this ignorance can be used to relate to challenges we are now going through – abhorring colonial mentality, attaining national identity, and yearning for independence. To say the least, Constantino was merely saying that social demands change overtime and so, we do not need to fully rely on Rizal’s national goals alone. We should learn from the weaknesses of great men and women of our history just like how we looked up to their strengths.
Everyone deserves the highest honour because everyone is capable of doing whatever we think is the best. The main question is not really whether or not Rizal deserves to be a national hero but rather “Is it necessary to have one National Hero?” Andres Bonifacio had his own setbacks, as well as Gabriela Silang, Heneral Antonio Luna, Apolinario Mabini, and all the great men and great women in our history. Each plays an important role in our history and yes, these heroes did what were needed for the betterment of our country. They did whatever they thought will be the good for all people during their time and they succeeded in their own way. They did it with courage when no one else could. If that is so, then what difference does it make if we only give the highest recognition to one person when there were thousands of people who worked hand-in-hand to develop the concept of a nation?
Rizal was a necessary movement. The first letter in the alphabet. The alpha. A moment in our history. But he was not just like that. He is the embodiment that we, younger generations, have the responsibility to finish what he started along with Bonifacio and the heroes after them. They shed blood for this nation and for future generations. They have molded us in every way they can. The future now depends solely on our hands and how we make good use of their strengths as well as their weaknesses.
Explanation:
mark me brainliest
7. what renato constantino said about history
Answer:
Renato constantino said about history "history is re-creation while literature is creation.
8. how did renato constantino criticized the influence of the american imperialism to the philippines?
Answer:
did renato constantino criticized the
Explanation:
criticized the influence of the american imperialism to the philippines
Answer:
Renato Constantino was the Filipino historian and scholar who taught us to reexamine our colonial history, to rectify it and to learn from that past. He wanted Filipinos to have a useful memory of a past to advance the Filipino's quest for genuine nationhood.
Explanation:
pa brainliest po ty
9. A history of the philippines renato constantino the true filipino is a decolonized filipino
Answer:
Naparang lamok
Naparang lamok
Naparang lamok
Naparang lamok
Naparang lamok
Naparang lamok
Naparang lamok
Naparang lamok Lamok
Explanation:
Answer:
The process of what Renato Constantino famously called. “the mis-education of Filipinos” (1966, 39) began with the imposition of English as the
Explanation:
10. ano ang mga naitulong ni Renato Constantino sa Pilipinas?
Siya ang kumanta ng mga kantang "Ikaw, Paasa T.A.N.G.A", atbp.
11. in the miseducation of the filipino what is the purpose of the author by renato constantino
Answer:
In 1959, famous Filipino nationalist historian Renato Constantino published an article titled, “The Mis-education of the Filipino.” In his seminal postcolonial essay, Constantino argued that education was an instrument of American colonial policy designed to divide society and hinder nationalistic development in the Philippines. Is education still a tool of American imperialism? How did liberal and imperial agendas intersect? Join us as Professor Guingona revisits education and brainwashing in the colonial Philippines, contemporary United States, and beyond.
12. Do you agree with the idea of Renato Constantino
Answer:
it's about you to decide,if you trust the idea of Renato Constantino
Explanation:
you decide
13. what is the contribution of Renato constantino in Philippine historiography
Explanation:
He wrote around 30 books and numerous pamphlets and monographs. Among Constantino's well-known books are A Past Revisited and The Continuing Past. He also wrote The Making of a Filipino (a biography of Claro M. Recto), Neo-colonial Identity and Counter-Consciousness, and The Nationalist Alternative.
14. Explain your own understanding about renato constantino means in his topic DEFILIPINIZATION?
Explanation:
So many souls have tested Him throughout the course of time
So many still reach out to Him with broken hearts and minds
And everyone of them will say with no exception that they find
Jesus never fails
Even in the days of old, He brought His people through
And then He came to show His love when He died for me and you
And then He rose again to prove that every story had been true
Jesus never fails
Jesus never fails (Jesus never fails)
Jesus never fails
You might as well get thee behind me, Satan, you cannot prevail
Because Jesus never fails
Sometimes, this world brings troubles that I find so hard to bear
I know I could not make it without Jesus being there
It's so encouraging to know, however deep we're in despair
That Jesus never fails
So, what can I do to prove to you?
Tell me, how can you deny?
No untold facts
No mysteries, it's all so cut and dry
On the witness stand of your life, I'll be the first to testify
That Jesus never fails
Jesus never fails (Jesus never fails)
Jesus never fails
You might as well get thee behind me, Satan, you cannot prevail
Because Jesus never...
I know that Jesus never fails (Jesus never fails)
Jesus never fails
You might as well get thee behind me, Satan, you cannot prevail
Because Jesus never... (Fails)
Jesus never... (Ooh)
Jesus never fails
Never fails
15. Renato constantino said about history
Answer: Renato Constantino was the Filipino historian and scholar who taught us to reexamine our colonial history, to rectify it and to learn from that past
Explanation:
16. What said Teordoro Agoncillo, reynaldo Ileto and Renato constantino about history?
Answer:
Teodoro Andal Agoncillo (November 9, 1912 – January 14, 1985) was a prominent 20th-century Filipino historian. He and his contemporary Renato Constantino were among the first Filipino historians renowned for promoting a distinctly nationalist point of view of Filipino history (nationalist historiography).
17. was renato constantino considered as a leader
Answer:
tula sa patakarang pananalapi
18. Situation that illustrates Renato Constantino's ideas?
Answer:
What is the social ideas of Renato Constantino?
He continued to articulate provocative sentiments about the issues of his time, most of which are still relatable up to today: government corruption and patronage politics, economic subservience due to foreign debt, the question of independence and sovereignty, and the like.
19. what are the question and issue in the miseducation in the filipino by renato constantino
Answer:
Renato Constantino was the Filipino historian and scholar who taught us to reexamine our colonial history, to rectify it and to learn from that past. He wanted Filipinos to have a useful memory of a past to advance the Filipino's quest for genuine nationhood.
Explanation:
pa brainless po thank you
20. Teodoro agoncillo, reynaldo ileto and renato constantino
Answer:
thanks sa points na binigay mo po
21. According to Renato Constantino who was the hero of filipino revolution
Answer:
Constantino claimed that US Governor General Howard Taft set up Rizal as a national hero because Rizal was considered a “reformist” and a “pacifist,” while Bonifacio was a revolutionary who resorted to violence to gain national independence.
Explanation:
Constantino claimed that Us Governor General Howard taft set up Rizal as a national hero because Rizal was considered a " reformist " and a pacifist " while bonifacio was a revolutionary who resorted to violence to gain national independence.
22. Constantino maintains that Filipinos venerate José Rizal without truly understanding him. Would you agree? If so can you give some examples of an unexamined adoration?
Answer:
i dont think so
Explanation:
the only i know is about jose rizal
23. renato constantino belief on post colonial historiography?
Answer:
history- was the major critic of nationalism, representing a view ... Renato Constantino, shifted the definition of "Filipino" away from simple.
Answer:
This article examines instances in Philippine historiography where nationalism, as a unitary end, has been used to elide and obscure class difference. It begins with a partial explanation of the lacunae in antinationalist thinking in the Philippines, and then proceeds to a critique of contemporary nationalist historiography. Using historians Zeus Salazar and Reynaldo Ileto as case studies, it examines how nationalist historiography can serve as means to implicitly justify localized acts of class oppression.
Explanation:
24. Ano ang wika para kay renato constantino
Answer:
Filipino
Explanation:
Renato Constantino was a Filipino historian known for being part of the leftist tradition of Philippine historiography.
25. ano ang mga naitulong ni Renato Constantino sa Pilipinas?
Siya ang kumanta ng mga kantang "Ikaw, Paasa T.A.N.G.A", atbp.
26. EXPLAIN RENATO CONSTANTINO'S SUPPOSITION THAT "PHILIPPINE HISTORY IS A STORY OF STRUGGLE".
Answer:
Philippines had been through a lot if we go down the memory lane of the Philippines, it's also a description of pain and sorrow.
Explanation:
hope it helps! Good Luck ^^
27. Sino si Renato Constantino , in tagalog please , SALAMAT PO
Renato Constantino ay isang Pilipinong istoryador na kilala bilang bahagi ng kaliwang tradisyon ng historiography ng Pilipinas. Bukod sa pagiging isang istoryador, si Constantino ay nakikibahagi din sa dayuhang serbisyo, nagtatrabaho para sa Philippine Mission sa United Nations at sa Kagawaran ng Kagawaran ng Panlabas.
28. kahulugan ng wika ayon kay renato constantino
Ang wika ay maituturing na behikulo ng pagpapahayag ng damdamin, isang instrumento sa pagtatago at pagsisiwalat ng katotohanan.
29. What Renato constantino said about history?
Answer:
taught us to reexamine our colonial history
Explanation:
I hope that help you
30. Brief explanation of the Rizal Law and the Catholic Hierarchy by Renato Constantino
Recto was the original author of the bill which make Rizal’sNoli me TangereandElFilibusterismocompulsary reading in all universities and colleges. Reported out by thecommittee on education, it was sponsored by Senator Laurel, committee chairman. Themeasure immediately ran into determined opposition from the Catholic hierarchyspearheaded in the Senate by Senators Decoroso Rosales, brother of Archbishop, nowCardinal Rosales; Mariano J. Cuenco, brother of Archbishop Cuenco; and FranciscoRodrigo, former president of Catholic Action. Their argument was that the bill would violatefreedom of conscience and religion. The Catholic hierarchy even issued a pastoral letterdetailing its objections to the bill and enjoining Catholics to oppose it. Despite the fact thatpublic hearings had already been conducted, Rodrigo proposed that the educationcommittee hold a closed-door conference with the Catholic hierarchy to search for a solution to the dispute.
