Rizal and morga jose rizal's annotations to morga's sucesos delas islas filipinas
1. Rizal and morga jose rizal's annotations to morga's sucesos delas islas filipinas
Answer:
Rizal's friend and indefatigable pen pal, Prof. Ferdinand Blumentritt, once suggested that he write a Philippine history book, but Rizal felt he neither had the time nor the energy, much less a wide knowledge of our past, so the next best thing was to annotate Morga's Sucesos.
Explanation:
sna maka tulong
2. similarities of rizal and morgas
Answer:
the similarity of rizal and morgas is rizal is a doctor and morgas is an lawyer the kind of the two is similar
3. similarities of rizal and morgas
Answer:
Basahin mo nalang welcome
4. What are the difference between dr. jose rizal to morga?
Answer:
BECAUSE HE MAKES ME HAPPYCJARROT
5. what is a rizal annotation of morga's sucesoa
Answer:
he selected the Sucesos because he "considered it necessary to invoke the testimony of an illustrous Spaniard who governed the destinies of the Philippines in the beginning of her new era and witnessed the last moments of our ancient nationality
6. What motivate rizal's to annotate morga's work?
Answer:
By publishing his annotated version of de Morga's Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas (Events of the Philippine Islands, originally published in 1609), Rizal's intent was not only to provide the Filipino people their early history, a pre-Spanish history, but to present to them their own authentic culture and identity.
Explanation:
7. pagkakaiba ng rizal at morga
Answer:
yung morga yun yung istatwa
Explanation:
yung rizal ay yung bayani
8. similarities and differences of jose rizal and Antonio morga's annotation
Answer:
By publishing his annotated version of de Morga's Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas (Events of the Philippine Islands, originally published in 1609), Rizal's intent was not only to provide the Filipino people their early history, a pre-Spanish history, but to present to them their own authentic culture and identity.
9. What is the significance of morga's work to rizal's mindset
Answer:
ayan ang sagot
Explanation:
paki tap nlng po
hope it's help po
10. The difference idie of dr. jose rizal and morga
Answer:
i dont know this but thank to the point
11. ano ang pagkakapareho at pagkakatulad ni rizal at morga
Answer:
RIZALisang bayaning manunulat
Morgaisa ding manunulat na katulad ni RIZAL
Explanation:
#Carry On Learning❤
12. Similarities and differences of rizal and morgas view on filipino culture
Explanation:
Answer is on the picture attached.
13. Annotation of rizal and morga in economics
Answer:
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
14. rizal and morga's same point of view
Answer:
sana makatulong yannnnn
15. compare morga and rizal works by weighing in the factors and information
https://tse2.mm.bing.net/th?id=OGC.b03ce6160383ea6f632ceb9798a40c0d&pid=Api&rurl=https%3a%2f%2fmedia.giphy.com%2fmedia%2fHUEhyW5POlhmg%2fgiphy.gif&ehk=aqL2arVhJQqNu%2fklco0Fm3urjR5g6CJbxs8fMfEaM0Y%3d
16. What is the significance of Morga’s work to Rizal’s mindset ?
Answer:
Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas (English: Events in the Philippine Islands) is a book written and published by Antonio de Morga considered as one of the most important works on the early history of the Spanish colonization of the Philippines.It was published in 1609 after he was reassigned to Mexico in two volumes by ...
17. Make a comparison of Morga’s book and Rizal’s annotation
Answer:
thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx thx
18. Compare and contrast rizal and morga's annotation
Answer:
(contrast)
Rizal and Morga’s different views about the Filipinos and the Philippine culture. rizal and morga view of pre-colonial filipino culture.
(Compare Rizal)
A ComparisonJose Rizal lamented that he was born and bred withut knowing our colonial past.
(Compare morga)
Morga was obviously fascinated with the social organization of the natives; he described origins, differences, privileges of social classes, upward and downward mobility, inheritance of possessions and titles.
19. How did Rizal know about Morga’s work?
Answer:
By publishing his annotated version of de Morga's Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas (Events of the Philippine Islands, originally published in 1609), Rizal's intent was not only to provide the Filipino people their early history, a pre-Spanish history, but to present to them their own authentic culture and identity
20. Compare and contrast morga writings and rizal annotations
Morga's "Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas" and Rizal's annotations on this book offer different perspectives on the history of the Philippines. Here are some ways in which they can be compared and contrasted:
Authorship: Morga wrote the original book, while Rizal provided annotations and commentary on it. Morga was a Spanish historian and colonial official who lived in the Philippines during the 16th century, while Rizal was a Filipino nationalist and writer who lived in the 19th century.
Historical context: Morga's book was written during the early period of Spanish colonization in the Philippines, while Rizal's annotations were written during the later period of Spanish rule when nationalist sentiments were growing.
Focus: Morga's book is a historical account of the Philippines during the 16th century, while Rizal's annotations focus on correcting inaccuracies and biases in Morga's account and highlighting the contributions of pre-colonial Philippine culture.
Language: Morga wrote his book in Spanish, the language of the colonizers, while Rizal's annotations were written in Spanish and Tagalog, the language of the colonized.
Perspective: Morga's account is written from the perspective of a Spanish colonizer, while Rizal's annotations provide a counter-narrative from the perspective of a Filipino nationalist.
Purpose: Morga's book was intended to justify Spanish colonization and portray it as a civilizing mission, while Rizal's annotations sought to challenge this narrative and assert the value of pre-colonial Philippine culture.
In summary, while Morga's "Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas" and Rizal's annotations on it both deal with Philippine history, they have different authorship, focus, perspective, and purpose, reflecting the changes in the colonial and nationalist contexts in which they were written.
21. Rizal's morga and views of philippine history reflection
Antonio de Morga, lieutenant governor of the Philippines in the late sixteenth century, described the food of the indios as follows: Their daily fare is composed of: lice crushed in wooden pillars and when cooked is called morisqueta (this is the staple throughout the land); cooked fish which they have in abundance; pork, venison, mountain buffaloes which they call carabaos, beef and fish which they know is best when it has started to mt and stink (Retana 1909,174). Reading this text in the British Museum 280 years later, Rizal was so incensed that he later responded in print with: This is another preoccupation of the Spaniards who, lii any other nation, treat food to which they are not accustomed or is unknown to them with disgust. The English, for ample, feel horror to see a Spaniard eating snails. To the Speninrd roast beef is repugnant and he cannot understad how Steak Tartar or raw beef can be eaten; the Chiiese who have taltlcn' and eat shark cannot stand Roquefort cheese etc. etc. This fish that Morga mentions, that cannot be good until it begins to mt, is bagoong [salted and fermented fish or shrimp paste used as a sauce in Filipino cuisine] and those who have eaten it and tasted it know that it neither is nor should be rotten (Rizal 1890, 264): Rizal's sarcastic rebuttal appears, surprisingl
22. compare and contrast morga's writings and Rizal annotation
Morga's writings and Rizal's annotations have similarities and differences in terms of their historical context, style of writing, and purpose.
Morga's writings, particularly the "Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas," were written during the 16th century, during the Spanish colonial period in the Philippines. It was written in the form of a historical account of the Philippines during the early colonial period. Morga's writing style was straightforward, factual, and aimed to provide an accurate account of the events that transpired during that time. The primary purpose of Morga's writing was to document the history of the Philippines during the early colonial period and to serve as a reference for future generations.
Rizal's annotations, on the other hand, were written in the late 19th century, during the Philippine Revolution against Spanish colonial rule. Rizal's annotations were made on Morga's "Sucesos," which he deemed as an accurate source of Philippine history. Rizal's writing style was more poetic and reflective, as he inserted his own thoughts and opinions on the events described in Morga's writings. The purpose of Rizal's annotations was to use Morga's "Sucesos" as a tool to awaken the Filipinos' sense of national consciousness and pride, and to educate them about their rich pre-colonial history.
In terms of content, Morga's writings primarily focused on the Spanish conquest of the Philippines, the establishment of Spanish rule, and the conversion of the Filipinos to Christianity. It also included descriptions of the customs and traditions of the Filipinos during that time. Rizal's annotations, on the other hand, emphasized the importance of the pre-colonial history of the Philippines, including the achievements of the early Filipinos before the arrival of the Spaniards.
In summary, while both Morga's writings and Rizal's annotations are historical accounts of the Philippines, they differ in terms of their historical context, writing style, and purpose. Morga's writings aimed to provide an accurate account of the early colonial period in the Philippines, while Rizal's annotations used Morga's work as a tool to awaken the Filipinos' sense of national consciousness and pride.
23. compare the differences of Rizal and Morga's view on Filipino culture
Answer:
By publishing his annotated version of de Morga's Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas (Events of the Philippine Islands, originally published in 1609),
Explanation:
24. rizal and morga's same point of view
Answer:
huh anung tanong yan haha
25. why did Rizal annotate the book of Morga's
Explanation:
because the book narrates the history of wars,intrigues, diplomacy and evangelization of the Philippines
26. Morga and rizal article analysis?
By publishing his annotated version of de Morga's Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas (Events of the Philippine Islands, originally published in 1609), Rizal's intent was not only to provide the Filipino people their early history, a pre-Spanish history, but to present to them their own authentic culture and identity.
pa brainliest nalng salamat#BRAINLIESTFAST
27. what are the aims of rizal in writing the annotation of Morga's book?
Answer:
By publishing his annotated version of de Morga's Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas (Events of the Philippine Islands, originally published in 1609), Rizal's intent was not only to provide the Filipino people their early history, a pre-Spanish history, but to present to them their own authentic culture and identity.#carryonlearning28. ano ang pagkakaiba ni rizal at morga sa kultura
Answer:
Morga was obviously fascinated with the social organization of the natives; he described origins, differences, privileges of social classes, upward and downward mobility, inheritance of possessions and titles. Rizal emphasized that native women, unlike their European counterparts, never lost their noble titles.
Explanation:
god bless
29. Was Rizal right in pointing out the errors of Morga's history of the Philippines?
Yes
in my opinion lol
30. what are the similarities and differences of jose rizal and antonio morga
Answer:
In Noli Me Tangere I started to sketch the present state of our native land. But the effect which my effort produced made me realize that, before attempting to unroll before your eyes the other pictures which were to follow, it was necessary first to post you on the past. So only can you fairly judge the present and estimate how much progress has been made during the three centuries (of Spanish rule).
